Health

a choice much more political than scientific

Written by Steven mark

DECRYPTION – The question now is whether to go further and impose it on the outside with the risk of provoking the rejection of the population.

A recent Japanese study estimated that the risk of contracting the virus is 18.7 times lower when outdoors than indoors.
A recent Japanese study estimated that the risk of contracting the virus is 18.7 times lower when outdoors than indoors. GAIZKA IROZ / AFP

Is wearing a mask outdoors really useful? The scientific consensus which is gradually emerging leans more towards the “no” in most cases. For a very simple reason: the wind, even light, disperses very quickly droplets and aerosols which carry the virus. Moreover, no open-label cluster has been identified to date. But the absence of proof never constitutes proof of the absence, one might rightly argue.

A recent Japanese study of 100 positive cases estimated that the risk of contracting the virus is 18.7 times lower when outdoors than indoors. If the precision of this figure is puzzling, this work says two things: that this risk is (very) low, but also that it is not completely zero. No one can rule out the hypothesis that it is possible to be infected on the terrace of a café, in the queue of a museum, in a crowded market or a bustling city center. Provided obviously that

This article is for subscribers only. You have 74% left at
discover.

Subscribe: 1 € for 2 months

Can be canceled at any time

About the author

Steven mark

Leave a Comment